Classical 89 Airing Show on the Current State of the Humanities

The show will air on Thursday, May 23 at 11:00 am and 8:00 pm on
Classical 89 and 11:30 am and 6:00 pm on
BYU Radio.

It will also be archived at BYU Radio.

The Humanities, Terrorism and the American Ideal

From a speech by Geoffrey Galt Harpham, Director, National Humanities Center

Bruce Cole, appeared at the inauguration of the new governor of the
State of Mississippi, one of the most deeply conservative states in the
union, to state that the humanities speak to “what makes us human:  the
legacy of our past, the ideas and principles that motivate us, and the
eternal questions that we still ponder.”  When you think about it, he
said, this was what the 9-11 bombers were really attacking, and what the
brave firemen and policemen who came to the aid of the survivors were
defending.  As Cole put it, “the values implicit in the study of the humanities are part of why we
were attacked on September 11.  The free and fearless exchange of ideas,
respect for individual conscience, belief in the power of education . .
. all these things are anathema to our country’s enemies. 
Understanding and affirming these principles is part of the battle. Today, it is especially urgent that we study American institutions,
culture and history.  Defending our democracy demands more than
successful military campaigns. It also requires an understanding of the ideals, ideas and institutions that have shaped our country.”

See full speech here: http://hum21.ku.dk/humanities_in_a_new_millenium/geoffrey_galt_harpham/. .

What is General Education For?

Is college about broad intellectual cultivation, research and self-discovery or is it about learning job skills? This is the subject of a current debate in Texas, which reflects a nationwide debate over the purpose and future of higher education. As in many such debates, high-level decision makers in Texas want to streamline college degrees and to focus them on immediate marketability. The goal is understandable, especially in a context of rising tuition. But do we need to cast doubt on the value of general education and the humanities in the process?

Missing in the debate is the fact that the modern economy depends on creativity and innovation, which is often generated by tapping into a broad range of knowledge, skills and competencies unavailable in single disciplines. The same goes for individual careers: testimony by leaders in fields ranging from medicine, engineering to technology all suggest that long-term career success depends on a balance or diversity of approaches, including the skills and modes of inquiry taught in the humanities. In other words, market evidence itself demonstrates that general education and the humanities have a crucial role to play in training students for successful careers.

Hunter Rawlings of the AAU puts it like this: “You just don’t know what your education is going to result in…”. “Many of the kids graduating from
college these days are going to hold a number of different jobs in their
lives, and many of those jobs have not yet been invented. For a world
like that, what’s the best education? Seems to me it’s a very general
education that enables you to think critically.” 
 
more here: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/21/opinion/sunday/bruni-questioning-the-missionof-college.html?hp

Thomas Friedman on Innovation

Thomas Friedman of the NYT argues that economic growth and long-term employment depend on innovation… that the jobs of the future don’t yet exist, they need to be invented. His big point is that American education needs to be reinvented to focus on the skills of innovation and creativity.

If Friedman’s general point is important and provocative, he is overly optimistic in his analysis and conclusions. Not everyone can invent their own job via innovation. The imperative in his title therefore seems somewhat flippant. He also does not take into account the
social, cultural and structural differences in his comparison of schooling in the US and Finland. Finally, while innovation often occurs at the intersections of disciplines, it is unlikely that students can “think critically” and imagine pathways to innovation if they haven’t first internalized a significant body of knowledge and specific methods of inquiry. Friedman assumes that existing knowledge is available as “facts” via MOOCs or Google; yet what student, without the proper guidance and motivation, is able to make the imaginative leap from facts to invention?

Training in the liberal arts has traditionally served American students well, both as citizens in a free society and as innovators in a free economy. I would argue that innovation depends–paradoxically–not on a break with this educational tradition but on remembering what it is and relearning how to seriously engage its modes of inquiry with the problems and issues of our time.

read here: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/31/opinion/sunday/friedman-need-a-job-invent-it.html?hp&_r=0

Are There Any Safe Bets?

Today’s NYT has a discussion forum for college bound students, tackling the question: is there a safe major that will guarantee career success?

You’ll hear the typical arguments: “Study science and technology…. English and philosophy are a waste of time…” “No, study the liberal arts… value is not defined by return on investment, but by civic engagement,” and so on. Both of these positions make some sense. But only by ignoring certain underlying realities. Science and technology can be useful for getting first jobs, but can also be self-limiting without other soft skills. Good jobs in these areas also require graduate training. And, true, English and philosophy degrees are the not the most obvious ticket to entry into the labor market.Yet evidence shows that many students in these majors thrive in the marketplace, especially when judged over the lifetime of a career. They are also excellent preparation for all professional schools, including medicine.

The response most aligned with our hybrid approach of Humanities+/+Humanities is the one by William Pannapacker. He encapsulates his position with the statement: “Don’t be the English major who says, ‘I’m scared of math and computers.’
Don’t be a chemistry major who says, ‘I never read books.” As we have argued repeatedly: humanities and liberal arts degrees are still viable and highly valued; the trick for gaining a toehold in the market, though, is to supplement such degrees with undergraduate research, a foreign language, some training in hard
skills and/or internships.

Today’s rapidly-changing global economy makes the path to long-term career success highly unpredictable. The market places a premium on flexibility, curiosity, drive and the ability to innovate. What single discipline in college prepares students for such conditions? It’s not clear. The best strategy is to combine disciplines and experiences in imaginative ways in order to create your own career pathways.

read more: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/03/24/for-the-college-bound-are-there-any-safe-bets/a-liberal-arts-foundation-for-any-career  

Forbes on Humanities and Careers

To the question: Does Your Major Matter? the authors of this article respond “yes” and “no”. Various studies show that engineering and tech majors are the most employable and highest paying majors immediately out of college. The story becomes more complex and counter-intuitive when you factor in long-term pay, career advancement over a lifetime, job satisfaction, and so on.

Excerpt:


“Regular readers of our column know that we are unabashed fans
and supporters of the humanities and the creative and performing arts.
We believe that the world’s thorniest problems will not be solved–nor
will our nation be secure–without an understanding of ethics, cultures
other than our own, and what it means to be fully human. And we have
seen first-hand that students who complete liberal arts degrees have
deeply satisfying–and productive–personal and professional lives.”

More here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/collegeprose/2012/10/29/does-your-major-matter/

*thanks to Dave Waddell for link

The BBC on Da Vinci and Modern Innovation

According to this BBC report, science and art, once taught in tandem in the time of Da Vinci, have become too radically separated in the modern university. Science and engineering are now paying the price because they are focusing too much on data and rote knowledge and not enough on unique combinations of scientific know-how and artistic thinking. New pathways toward innovation are not found in more science, we are told, but in the development of the imagination and creative vision to harness scientific thinking in new ways.

Einstein often made the same point about the process of theorization: “I am enough of an artist to draw freely upon my imagination.
Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited.
Imagination encircles the world.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-21719784

*thanks to Lynn Williams for the link

New Study Says College Degree Is Not Enough

According to a recent study, employers are finding that recent college grads lack the skills required for entry into the labor market. Even students with “marketable” technical training often lack the kind of liberal arts training that most innovative companies need.

One problem is that employers no longer do job training–they expect students to be “job-ready” right out of college.Yet faculty in many liberal arts or humanities colleges do not (or do not want) to see themselves as playing a role in career preparation. Even in cases where they want to help, the way forward is unclear. Combine this with 90% of college students who consider college primarily as job training and you begin to see a deepening crisis for everyone involved.

Where does this disconnect come from? What are the solutions? See article here:

http://chronicle.com/article/A-College-Degree-Sorts-Job/137625/#id=overview

Our approach to these challenges in the Humanities College at BYU has been to:

1) Encourage students to balance their education between technical/vocational and humanities disciplines. A hybrid approach–what Phil Gardner calls “a technically savvy liberal arts major or a liberally trained technical major”–is now what the market requires. Make this known to students, faculty and advisors across campus. Often we confine students to our own academic silos.

2) Focus on advising as the ground zero for messaging about how to bridge academics and careers.

3) Strongly encourage or require professionally-relevant experiences, such as undergraduate research or internships. All the evidence points to the internship as the deciding factor. But make sure it’s the right kind of internship and of sufficient duration to be meaningful.

4) Run advising workshops that teach students how to discuss the relation between academic study and internship experiences in ways that resonate with future employers.